Too many organizations are suffering from
under-performing teams. Accountability and an unwavering commitment to the
shared goals of the organization are critical to avoid teams under delivering
and negatively impacting their organization. My previous employer did a
beautiful job demonstrating how high-performing teams behave when a team member
is slipping up and failing to meet their goals. A weekly meeting was taking
place and one of the individuals, we’ll call her Joan, was struggling to meet
her projections for the quarter.
Typically, the team would exchange
disinterested looks as if to imply “Oh, bummer.” In some extreme cases it even
got to the point of schadenfreude, where team members gleaned a sense of joy
from seeing one of their teammates fail. However, in this particular case,
having embraced the standard work Greenlight principles, the team consensus was
one of deep concern. Their sense of shared ownership and accountability
prompted one of the other team members to speak up: “Let’s not leave the room
until we all help Joan get back on track.” This response shows true leadership.
This is how high-performing teams respond when a member is struggling.
Science validates this high-performance
behavior, too, as recent research shows that accountability and
sharing goals improves goal achievement by 35%. Unfortunately, the vast
majority of teams do not behave like this; they fall somewhere else on what we
call the “Integrity Continuum.” At one end of the continuum are poorly
performing teams. They talk behind one another’s backs, are gleeful at someone
else’s failure as though it elevates them, and are far out of integrity. Then
you have average teams. They are characterized by indifference. Individuals are
not necessarily happy about the failings of others, they are just glad it’s not
them. Further toward the right of the spectrum is what good teams do, they
share the burden, picking up their team members load and walking with it.
People generally presume this is optimal but there is one step further.
Really great teams are so committed to one
another that they don’t just share the burden but proactively assist in the
development of a struggling teammate. For high-performing teams it’s not just
about solving the problem and ensuring numbers are hit, it’s about dealing with
the root issue through co-elevating struggling team members and committing to
their success and development as they would their own.
A key first step to ensuring your team is
situated on the far right of the “Integrity Continuum” is a practice that I
have learned it by experience called Collaborative Problem Solving. It is one
of the high-return practices we use to improve business outcomes and provide
teams with a structure for collaborating on, and holding each other accountable
for, the accomplishment of strategic goals throughout a particular time frame.
Considering also the below functions that
started to be as must for success;
- Set and
commit to goals with one another
- Follow up
on these goals on a weekly or bi-weekly basis
- Review
goals and share progress with the team at each follow-up
- Discuss
areas in which support is needed and get clear on what is planned next
- At the end
of each cycle do a brief, team review to celebrate the goals that have
been completed and to debrief those that have not been
For an organisation to perform at its best,
teams need to have a real commitment to shared goals which is backed by a sense
of accountability to one another’s outcomes. Attaining this requires a
conscious and proactive effort which is where practices such as Collaborative
Problem Solving come in. There needs to be a collective sense of ownership
so that the prevailing attitude is “your results are my results; our results
are the organisations results.” This kind of co-elevation, where team members
own each other’s successes and never let each other fail, is what a commitment
to shared goals is really about.

No comments:
Post a Comment